Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 276300.

276
AHA Santa Clara MGP, LLC
4 projects · 3 JVs
77% JV
470
units
277
Homecomings, Inc.
6 projects · 2 JVs
16% JV
469
units
278
Satellite Housing, Inc.
8 projects · 2 JVs
26% JV
467
units
279
Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Pover
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+514 pipeline
463
units
280
Wasco Affordable Housing, Inc.
7 projects · 3 JVs
55% JV
462
units
281
Beacon Communities Inc.
3 projects · 1 JVs
42% JV
460
units
282
PAM Development, Inc.
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
455
units
283
RHF Holdings Group, Inc.
10 projects · 10 JVs
100% JV
453
units
284
Integrated Community Development
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV+237 pipeline
452
units
285
AHA VENTURA MGP, LLC
4 projects · 3 JVs
77% JV
450
units
286
WNC CPP, LLC
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
449
units
287
Napa Valley Community Housing
6 projects
0% JV
446
units
288
Fairfield Financial LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
444
units
289
People's Self-Help Housing Corporation
8 projects · 4 JVs
52% JV+330 pipeline
442
units
290
Shaw Housing Partners, a CA limited Partnership
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
441
units
291
Building Better Partnerships, Inc.
9 projects · 9 JVs
100% JV+194 pipeline
441
units
292
Foundation for Affordable Housing III
3 projects · 2 JVs
77% JV
440
units
293
BlueGreen Preservation
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
439
units
294
West Coast Redevelopers, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
438
units
295
MDG Properties LLC
2 projects
0% JV
436
units
296
Housing Development Partners of San Diego
3 projects · 2 JVs
83% JV
435
units
297
CHOC
7 projects · 5 JVs
60% JV
434
units
298
COR F3 FNMA, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
434
units
299
HumanGood Affordable Housing
5 projects · 4 JVs
78% JV
433
units
300
Mission Economic Develo
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
431
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 276300.

AHA Santa Clara MGP, LLC
23% sole sponsor77% JV
Homecomings, Inc.
84% sole sponsor16% JV
Satellite Housing, Inc.
74% sole sponsor26% JV
Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Pover
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Wasco Affordable Housing, Inc.
45% sole sponsor55% JV
Beacon Communities Inc.
58% sole sponsor42% JV
PAM Development, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
RHF Holdings Group, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Integrated Community Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA VENTURA MGP, LLC
23% sole sponsor77% JV
WNC CPP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Napa Valley Community Housing
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Fairfield Financial LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
People's Self-Help Housing Corporation
48% sole sponsor52% JV
Shaw Housing Partners, a CA limited Partnership
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Building Better Partnerships, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Foundation for Affordable Housing III
23% sole sponsor77% JV
BlueGreen Preservation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
West Coast Redevelopers, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MDG Properties LLC
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Housing Development Partners of San Diego
17% sole sponsor83% JV
CHOC
40% sole sponsor60% JV
COR F3 FNMA, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
HumanGood Affordable Housing
22% sole sponsor78% JV
Mission Economic Develo
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.