Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 351375.

351
Sac4 Cornucopia LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
347
units
352
Northpoint Housing, Inc.
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
346
units
353
The Michaels Development Company
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV+57 pipeline
345
units
354
Bath Street Partners, Inc.
2 projects
0% JV
344
units
355
Palo Alto Housing Corporation
6 projects · 4 JVs
64% JV
343
units
356
Stamas Corp
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
343
units
357
Beyond Shelter Housing Development Corporation
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
342
units
358
Pico Union Housing Corp.
6 projects · 2 JVs
32% JV
338
units
359
National Affordable Communities
6 projects · 2 JVs
29% JV
338
units
360
Montalvo Associates
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
335
units
361
AHA Los Angeles MGP, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
334
units
362
Abbey Road
5 projects · 3 JVs
46% JV+124 pipeline
333
units
363
Many Mansions, a California nonprofit corporation
6 projects · 1 JVs
18% JV
330
units
364
WCH Affordable XI, LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
329
units
365
AHA MGP Delta II, LLC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
328
units
366
Community Advancement Development Corporation
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
328
units
367
AHA Riverside West MPG, LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
328
units
368
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV+8,474 pipeline
322
units
369
Veterans Housing Partnership
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
322
units
370
RCD GP III LLC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV+162 pipeline
322
units
371
Oakland Housing Authority
3 projects · 1 JVs
52% JV
321
units
372
WCH Affordable IX, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
320
units
373
To Be Formed LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+378 pipeline
320
units
374
Workforce Homebuilders LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
319
units
375
RCD GP LLC
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV+190 pipeline
318
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 351375.

Sac4 Cornucopia LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Northpoint Housing, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The Michaels Development Company
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Bath Street Partners, Inc.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Palo Alto Housing Corporation
36% sole sponsor64% JV
Stamas Corp
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Beyond Shelter Housing Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Pico Union Housing Corp.
68% sole sponsor32% JV
National Affordable Communities
71% sole sponsor29% JV
Montalvo Associates
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA Los Angeles MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Abbey Road
54% sole sponsor46% JV
Many Mansions, a California nonprofit corporation
82% sole sponsor18% JV
WCH Affordable XI, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA MGP Delta II, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Community Advancement Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA Riverside West MPG, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Veterans Housing Partnership
0% sole sponsor100% JV
RCD GP III LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Oakland Housing Authority
48% sole sponsor52% JV
WCH Affordable IX, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
To Be Formed LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Workforce Homebuilders LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
RCD GP LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.