Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 526550.

526
New Life Economic Development, Inc.
3 projects · 2 JVs
57% JV
187
units
527
Aszkenazy Development, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
185
units
528
Holos, Inc.
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV+39 pipeline
185
units
529
Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
183
units
530
Petaluma Ecumenical Properties
4 projects · 3 JVs
77% JV
182
units
531
East Palo Alto Community Alliance & Neighborhood D
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
182
units
532
Central Valley Coalition
3 projects · 2 JVs
76% JV
182
units
533
John P. Casper Trust
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
181
units
534
Lynx Realty and Management
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
181
units
535
Silver Cove MGP, LLC
2 projects
0% JV
181
units
536
HACSC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
180
units
537
AOL/Pacific
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
180
units
538
El Pueblo Community Development Corp.
3 projects
0% JV
179
units
539
Intercontinental Affordable Housing
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
179
units
540
Urban Housing Communities, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
178
units
541
Related Companies of California
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
178
units
542
Paramount Realty
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
178
units
543
MCB Family Housing, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
178
units
544
MFPA, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
177
units
545
Double Rock Ventures, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
176
units
546
HCHP Affordable Multi-Housing, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
175
units
547
WCH Affordable IV, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
173
units
548
LaBarge Industries
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
173
units
549
MW Development, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
171
units
550
Redwood Housing Services, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
170
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 526550.

New Life Economic Development, Inc.
43% sole sponsor57% JV
Aszkenazy Development, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Holos, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Petaluma Ecumenical Properties
23% sole sponsor77% JV
East Palo Alto Community Alliance & Neighborhood D
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Central Valley Coalition
24% sole sponsor76% JV
John P. Casper Trust
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Lynx Realty and Management
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Silver Cove MGP, LLC
100% sole sponsor0% JV
HACSC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AOL/Pacific
0% sole sponsor100% JV
El Pueblo Community Development Corp.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Intercontinental Affordable Housing
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Urban Housing Communities, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Related Companies of California
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Paramount Realty
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MCB Family Housing, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MFPA, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Double Rock Ventures, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
HCHP Affordable Multi-Housing, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
WCH Affordable IV, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
LaBarge Industries
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MW Development, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Redwood Housing Services, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.