Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 726750.

726
AHA MacArthur MGP, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
92
units
727
Housing Authority of Fresno County
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
92
units
728
CC Seabreeze, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
92
units
729
Picerne Group Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
92
units
730
BHNR, Inc.
2 projects · 1 JVs
52% JV
91
units
731
Mission Court MGP, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
90
units
732
Hermandad Mexicana Nacional
2 projects
0% JV
89
units
733
Phoenix Development Company of Minneapolis
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
89
units
734
The Uplift All Foundation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
88
units
735
Philip R Hammond, Jr.
2 projects
0% JV
88
units
736
Daylight Community Development
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV+188 pipeline
87
units
737
MHDC CA MGP III LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
87
units
738
The Michaels Dev. Co., I, LP, a New Jersey limited
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
86
units
739
TPC Holdings V, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
86
units
740
Rincon De Los Esteros, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
85
units
741
575 Vallejo Street, Inc.
2 projects · 1 JVs
47% JV
85
units
742
Rona Barrett Foundation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
85
units
743
Figueroa Economical Housing Development Corporatio
2 projects · 1 JVs
46% JV
84
units
744
COALITION FOR BETTER LIVING
2 projects · 1 JVs
49% JV
82
units
745
CRDC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
82
units
746
Almond Court, Inc.
2 projects · 1 JVs
52% JV
82
units
747
Veloce Partners
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
81
units
748
Quechan Housing Authority
2 projects
0% JV+26 pipeline
81
units
749
Mecca Housing Associates
2 projects · 1 JVs
61% JV
80
units
750
Dan Chandler
2 projects
0% JV
80
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 726750.

AHA MacArthur MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Authority of Fresno County
0% sole sponsor100% JV
CC Seabreeze, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Picerne Group Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
BHNR, Inc.
48% sole sponsor52% JV
Mission Court MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Hermandad Mexicana Nacional
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Phoenix Development Company of Minneapolis
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The Uplift All Foundation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Philip R Hammond, Jr.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Daylight Community Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MHDC CA MGP III LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The Michaels Dev. Co., I, LP, a New Jersey limited
0% sole sponsor100% JV
TPC Holdings V, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Rincon De Los Esteros, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
575 Vallejo Street, Inc.
53% sole sponsor47% JV
Rona Barrett Foundation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Figueroa Economical Housing Development Corporatio
54% sole sponsor46% JV
COALITION FOR BETTER LIVING
51% sole sponsor49% JV
CRDC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Almond Court, Inc.
48% sole sponsor52% JV
Veloce Partners
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Quechan Housing Authority
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Mecca Housing Associates
39% sole sponsor61% JV
Dan Chandler
100% sole sponsor0% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.