Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 151175.

151
Bentall Residential
9 projects · 9 JVs
100% JV
815
units
152
AHA San Jose II MGP, LLC
5 projects · 4 JVs
89% JV
814
units
153
PacH Sac-Midtown Holdings, LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
803
units
154
Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara
16 projects · 16 JVs
100% JV+291 pipeline
802
units
155
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
6 projects · 3 JVs
57% JV
787
units
156
AHA Inland II MGP, LLC
4 projects · 3 JVs
75% JV
776
units
157
OHDC
13 projects · 13 JVs
100% JV
766
units
158
Christian Church Homes
8 projects · 7 JVs
92% JV
765
units
159
TELACU Homes, Inc.
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
762
units
160
Advanced Development
17 projects · 17 JVs
100% JV
762
units
161
Nexus MGP LLC
10 projects · 10 JVs
100% JV
759
units
162
Investment Inc.
16 projects · 16 JVs
100% JV
750
units
163
National Community Renaissance of CA
11 projects · 11 JVs
100% JV
750
units
164
Kingdom Development, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+626 pipeline
748
units
165
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
15 projects · 7 JVs
50% JV+49 pipeline
744
units
166
SDG Housing Partners
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
741
units
167
Citizens Housing Corporation
9 projects · 9 JVs
100% JV
738
units
168
Avenida Espana HDC, Inc.
9 projects · 8 JVs
89% JV
737
units
169
PH La Moraga Holdings, LLC
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
734
units
170
Housing Authority of the City of Fresno
14 projects · 14 JVs
100% JV+50 pipeline
731
units
171
MAAC Project
5 projects · 3 JVs
66% JV
731
units
172
Hampstead Partners, Inc.
7 projects · 7 JVs
100% JV
730
units
173
Brookmore Apartment Corporation
7 projects · 3 JVs
53% JV
726
units
174
Butte County Affordable Housing Development Corpor
13 projects · 13 JVs
100% JV
724
units
175
Southern California Housing Development Corporatio
10 projects · 8 JVs
84% JV
723
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 151175.

Bentall Residential
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA San Jose II MGP, LLC
11% sole sponsor89% JV
PacH Sac-Midtown Holdings, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
43% sole sponsor57% JV
AHA Inland II MGP, LLC
25% sole sponsor75% JV
OHDC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Christian Church Homes
8% sole sponsor92% JV
TELACU Homes, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Advanced Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Nexus MGP LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Investment Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
National Community Renaissance of CA
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Kingdom Development, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
50% sole sponsor50% JV
SDG Housing Partners
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Citizens Housing Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Avenida Espana HDC, Inc.
11% sole sponsor89% JV
PH La Moraga Holdings, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Authority of the City of Fresno
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MAAC Project
34% sole sponsor66% JV
Hampstead Partners, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Brookmore Apartment Corporation
47% sole sponsor53% JV
Butte County Affordable Housing Development Corpor
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Southern California Housing Development Corporatio
16% sole sponsor84% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.