Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 176200.

176
Monterey County HA Development Corporation
9 projects · 2 JVs
21% JV
721
units
177
Alpha III Development, Inc.
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
718
units
178
CRP Affordable Housing
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV+1,253 pipeline
716
units
179
Related Irvine Development Company
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV+979 pipeline
715
units
180
Lynx Realty & Management
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
712
units
181
KBS Housing, LLC
7 projects · 7 JVs
100% JV
712
units
182
MHDC CA MGP, LLC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
708
units
183
The Southern California Housing Development Corpor
11 projects · 10 JVs
86% JV
708
units
184
TBD
9 projects · 9 JVs
100% JV+149 pipeline
703
units
185
Gung Ho - Partners, LLC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
700
units
186
Housing Alternatives, Inc.
14 projects · 10 JVs
75% JV
700
units
187
Housing Authority of the County of Kern
12 projects · 12 JVs
100% JV+572 pipeline
695
units
188
South County Housing
12 projects · 3 JVs
24% JV
695
units
189
Step Forward Communities
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
695
units
190
1755 EFM 2, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
694
units
191
Affordable Housing Associates
15 projects · 15 JVs
100% JV
693
units
192
Cyrus Youssefi, Individually
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
693
units
193
Allied Housing, Inc.
9 projects · 3 JVs
21% JV+167 pipeline
692
units
194
ADK Properties LLC
13 projects · 13 JVs
100% JV+96 pipeline
685
units
195
FF Development LP
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
685
units
196
BETTER HOUSING FOUNDATION
9 projects · 4 JVs
22% JV
683
units
197
Housing Authority of Fresno County, California
12 projects · 12 JVs
100% JV
682
units
198
St. Anton Partners, LLC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
679
units
199
Casa Familiar, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
669
units
200
Rainbow - California Nine, LLC
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
669
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 176200.

Monterey County HA Development Corporation
79% sole sponsor21% JV
Alpha III Development, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
CRP Affordable Housing
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Related Irvine Development Company
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Lynx Realty & Management
0% sole sponsor100% JV
KBS Housing, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MHDC CA MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The Southern California Housing Development Corpor
14% sole sponsor86% JV
TBD
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Gung Ho - Partners, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Alternatives, Inc.
25% sole sponsor75% JV
Housing Authority of the County of Kern
0% sole sponsor100% JV
South County Housing
76% sole sponsor24% JV
Step Forward Communities
0% sole sponsor100% JV
1755 EFM 2, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Affordable Housing Associates
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Cyrus Youssefi, Individually
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Allied Housing, Inc.
79% sole sponsor21% JV
ADK Properties LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
FF Development LP
0% sole sponsor100% JV
BETTER HOUSING FOUNDATION
78% sole sponsor22% JV
Housing Authority of Fresno County, California
0% sole sponsor100% JV
St. Anton Partners, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Casa Familiar, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Rainbow - California Nine, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.