Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 201225.

201
W.O.R.K.S.
10 projects · 10 JVs
100% JV
668
units
202
Turk Street Inc.
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
665
units
203
Assisted Living Foundation of America
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
661
units
204
PSCDC
6 projects · 5 JVs
97% JV
648
units
205
Palm Desert Development Company
9 projects · 9 JVs
100% JV
647
units
206
A.F. Evans Company, Inc.
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
639
units
207
The John Stewart Company
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
638
units
208
Klein Financial Corporation
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV+74 pipeline
633
units
209
Rural Communities Housing Development Corporation
15 projects · 6 JVs
48% JV+31 pipeline
624
units
210
Valued Housing II, LLC
7 projects · 7 JVs
100% JV+31 pipeline
622
units
211
WNC
7 projects · 7 JVs
100% JV
622
units
212
John Stewart Company
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
617
units
213
Central Valley Coalition for Afforable Housing
8 projects · 6 JVs
64% JV
612
units
214
Deep Green Housing and Community Development
10 projects · 9 JVs
81% JV+125 pipeline
609
units
215
Skid Row Housing Trust
7 projects · 7 JVs
100% JV
608
units
216
Opportunity Builders
9 projects · 8 JVs
87% JV
607
units
217
Clifford Beers Housing, Inc.
13 projects · 12 JVs
92% JV
606
units
218
National CORE
9 projects · 9 JVs
100% JV
600
units
219
C.F.Y. Development, Inc.
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
599
units
220
Care Housing Services Corporation
8 projects · 5 JVs
55% JV
594
units
221
Affordable Housing Resources, Inc.
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
592
units
222
San Diego Interfaith Housing Foundation
8 projects · 3 JVs
43% JV+292 pipeline
589
units
223
Visionary Home Builders of California, Inc.
13 projects · 9 JVs
82% JV
584
units
224
Neighborhood Partners, LLC
12 projects · 9 JVs
84% JV
582
units
225
Standard Property Company, Inc. dba Standard Commu
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
579
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 201225.

W.O.R.K.S.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Turk Street Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Assisted Living Foundation of America
0% sole sponsor100% JV
PSCDC
3% sole sponsor97% JV
Palm Desert Development Company
0% sole sponsor100% JV
A.F. Evans Company, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The John Stewart Company
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Klein Financial Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Rural Communities Housing Development Corporation
52% sole sponsor48% JV
Valued Housing II, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
WNC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
John Stewart Company
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Central Valley Coalition for Afforable Housing
36% sole sponsor64% JV
Deep Green Housing and Community Development
19% sole sponsor81% JV
Skid Row Housing Trust
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Opportunity Builders
13% sole sponsor87% JV
Clifford Beers Housing, Inc.
8% sole sponsor92% JV
National CORE
0% sole sponsor100% JV
C.F.Y. Development, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Care Housing Services Corporation
45% sole sponsor55% JV
Affordable Housing Resources, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
San Diego Interfaith Housing Foundation
57% sole sponsor43% JV
Visionary Home Builders of California, Inc.
18% sole sponsor82% JV
Neighborhood Partners, LLC
16% sole sponsor84% JV
Standard Property Company, Inc. dba Standard Commu
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.